Skip to main content
GAPNEWS

Koforidua court quashes Okyenhene’s destoolment of Akyem Hemanghene




The  Division of Koforidua High Court has quashed the destoolment of Chief of Akyem Hemang Osabarima Prof. Mirikissi Apori Atta by the Okyenhene Osagyefo Amoatia Ofori Panin II, President of Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council on July 1, 2019.
The Court, presided over by Her Ladyship, Mrs Justice Cecilia N.S. Davis in a 32 page Judgment delivered on April 3, 2020, declared that the decision by the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council as announced by Okyenhene Osagyefuo Amoatia Ofori Panin destooling the Chief of Akyem Hemang for failing to appear before the council is ” null and void and of no legal effect and the said decision is quashed”

The Court also awarded a cost of Gh10,000 against Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council and Okyenhene in favour of Chief of Akyem Hemang.

On Monday 1st July 2019 Okyenhene Osagyefuo Amoatia Ofori Panin announced the destoolment of Akyem Hemang Chief at Ofori Panin Fie for failing to honour his summon over complaints of uncustomary conduct and harassment of the people of Dome and Gyampomani, and also his alleged unlawful claim of ownership of lands in the two Villages.

The decision to destool Akyem Hemang Chief was taken in the presence of Daasebre Boamah Darko-Adontenehe and Kukurantumihene, Daasebre Asumadu Appiah, Oseawuohene and Akyem Wenkyihene, Members of Kyebi Executive Council and Purported Kingmakers and representatives of Hemanghene.

Libation was subsequently poured and Sheep slaughtered as a symbol of customary validity to the destoolment of Akyem Hemanghene.
But in an application for judicial review in the nature of certiorari filed by the Applicant -Osabarima Prof. Mirikissi Apori Atta to quash the destoolment decision, he explained that, on 21st May 2019, he was invited to meet the Kyebi Executive Council (an advisory body constituted by Okyenhene), on 3rd June 2019, ”on matters concerning the claim of ownership over Dome Land”.

However, his inability to appear before the council was not deliberate as he had then travelled outside the country and so he directed his lawyer to write to the traditional council which was duly done but surprisingly read in the media his destoolment by Okyenhene.

He said the genesis of the decision to destool him albeit uncustomarily, was as a result of his resilience in fighting illegal logging and mining within the Akyem Hemang stools despite all odds and powerful hands behind it.

He, therefore, described his destoolment as against natural justice, bias, unfair, uncustomarily and sheer display of power. He pointed out that his destoolment by Okyenhene without pressing charges against him is unlawful and an error of law.

In an affidavit of opposition, the lawyer for the respondents therein-AKyem Abuakwa Traditional Council and Okyenhene said the Applicant failed to show that it was the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council and Okyenhene that conveyed the meeting that decision of his destoolment was reached.
The respondent added that the application is not maintainable since the

Okyenhene who was sued as an interested party in his capacity, is not amenable to the High Court”s supervisory jurisdiction, in as far as his decisions are concerned, that, he is not being a public officer, judicial officer or person acting judicially, therefore, his decisions are not subject to judicial review.

The court however maintained in the judgement that after analyzing all evidence before it, it is evident that Okyenhene Osagyefuo Amotia Ofori Panin announced the decision of the destoolment of the Akyem Hemanghene, in his capacity as Member and President of Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council and the decision of the destoolment of Akyem Hemang Chief is the decision of the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council, from the circumstances of the case.
Source: starrfm.com.gh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happily, the two directors who caused PBC woes lost their bid to be NPP parliamentary candidates – Mahama

GAPNEWS Happily, the two directors who caused PBC woes lost their bid to be NPP parliamentary candidates – Mahama Former President John Dramani Mahama has said that the directors of the Produce Buying Company (PBC) will be investigated for their actions that caused the problems of the company. Mr Mahama accused the two directors of attempting to seek refuge in Parliament from accountability, but God being so good, they lost their bid to be parliamentary candidates on the ticket of the New Patriotic Party (NPP). Speaking with cocoa farmers in Kumasi and the General Agriculture Workers Union on Thursday, February 8, the flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) said, “The workers of PBC have not been paid for about 8 months to 9 months and it is not known when they will receive their salaries, it is instructive to note that two of the directors who have left PBC into the ditch could see that they had finished the company and so they were looking for new careers and so they wen...

Finance Minister Amin Adam outlines seven priority points in his first meeting with mg’t of MoF

GAPNEWS Finance Minister Amin Adam outlines seven priority points in his first meeting with mg’t of MoF The Minister for Finance, Dr. Mohammed Amin Adam has outlined seven priority points in his first meeting with the Management of the Ministry. He met the entire management on Monday February 19 I will bring new urgency to bear on the work so we can run and fly and make an impact within this short period” he said. Dr Amin succeeded Ken Ofori-Atta at the Ministry in the recent ministerial reshuffle done by President Akufo-Addo on Febraury 14. Earlier, he told journalists that “Revenue collection will be pursued aggressively. So you are going to see me moving around the revenue centres, the ports, the airport, and the market areas to encourage the staff of GRA to collect more revenue but also to institute a friendly approach to collecting revenue.”

Re-assigned ministers must be vetted –Dafeamekpo

GAPNEWS Re-assigned ministers must be vetted –Dafeamekpor The Minority in Parliament has said that all the re-assigned ministers will have to be vetted and approved by the Appointment Committee of Parliament. The opposition lawmaker says served notice to contest the re-assignments of 5 ministers of state to the office of the president at the Supreme Court. South Dayi Member of Parliament contends that the ministers must be subjected to parliamentary approval and not just occupy the office without approval. “I am saying on the authority of the constitution that those persons’ appointments were revoked by the president, and their re-assignment must be subjected to parliamentary scrutiny. “So, we are demanding that those five ministers he has reassigned must be subjected to parliamentary vetting, and that is the procedure, so they cannot escape parliamentary scrutiny,” he said in Parliament on Friday. He added “We will do our duty as the constitution demands, and we will demand that their...